Turn papers and lab records into questions worth testing
Read the literature and your lab’s record side by side, and find the questions worth your next experiment.
Two 2025 papers report the same drift with one detergent lot.
12
Variable controls in runs 12 and 14, with the cause unresolved.
34
Gap: no run in the record tests the detergent lot.
A 2024 paper compares blocking agents across membrane types.
5
Not found in the covered record.
Where your records have nothing, it says so.
Compare the literature with your own lab data
Side by side
See what published work reports next to what your lab has recorded: results, conditions tried, failures and contradictions.
Careful about what is missing
When your records have nothing on a point, it tells you, so you can see where your lab’s evidence runs out.
A start for the next experiment
Each gap shows the relevant sources and where the record is silent, so the next conversation starts from facts.
What you can rely on
- Every gap shows its sources on both sides, or says which side is missing.
- Contradictions in your records stay visible.
- The search terms are yours to edit and approve.
What it won’t do
- Assume your lab never tried something just because it found nothing.
- Send anything to PubMed without your approval.
From start to finish in three steps
- 1
Set the topic
Name the question or method you want to test against the literature.
- 2
Approve the search
Check the search terms filled in from your topic, edit them and approve them.
- 3
Review the gaps
Each gap shows the relevant sources and where the record is silent.
The other tools on the same memory
Bring one real question from your lab
See it work in a private demo on example records, with nothing to upload and no commitment.
Request a demo